I like jq, but I always have to think pretty hard about how to construct the right syntax for it.
Here's how I used the GPT-3 playground to solve a simple jq
problem.
I wanted to sum up the total number of comments in JSON that looks like this (truncated example):
[
{
"id": "31195431",
"title": "Automatically filing issues when tracked file content changes",
"url": "https://simonwillison.net/2022/Apr/28/issue-on-changes/",
"dt": "2022-04-28T17:29:37",
"points": 14,
"submitter": "simonw",
"commentsUrl": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31195431",
"numComments": 4
},
{
"id": "31185496",
"title": "Parallel SQL Queries in Datasette",
"url": "https://simonwillison.net/2022/Apr/27/parallel-queries/",
"dt": "2022-04-27T20:39:50",
"points": 1,
"submitter": "frogger8",
"commentsUrl": "https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31185496",
"numComments": 3
}
]
The first prompt I tried was:
# Use jq to calculate the sum of the num field in each object in this array:
echo '[
{"num": 1},
{"num": 2}
]' | jq
I hinted at how I wanted to do this by piping to jq
but without any argument.
GPT-3 completed that to:
echo '[
{"num": 1},
{"num": 2}
]' | jq 'reduce .[] as $item (0; . + $item.num)'
... then a bunch more output that gave further examples, which I ignored
This is good - that solution works! Here's what happens when I run it:
~ % echo '[
{"num": 1},
{"num": 2}
]' | jq 'reduce .[] as $item (0; . + $item.num)'
3
But I'm not a big fan of reduce
in general - I always have to think a bit about what it's actually doing.
So I added a follow-up prompt:
Now do that without using reduce:
And GPT-3 replied:
echo '[
{"num": 1},
{"num": 2}
]' | jq '. | map(.num) | add'
This is the exact solution I was looking for.
Created 2022-08-10T08:23:36-07:00 · Edit